Two Assertions made by Ramanujan (Corrigenda)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Two Exams Taken by Ramanujan in India
On Thursday and Friday, December 3 and 4, of 1903, Srinivasa Ramanujan, who was to become the greatest Indian mathematician in his country’s history, sat for the Matriculation Examination of Madras University. From documents recently found in the Tamil Nadu Archives, we have learned that Ramanujan obtained a Second Class place, permitting him to enter the Government College of Kumbakonam in the...
متن کاملCorrigenda/Erratum
1. Nesselmann C, Ma N, Bieback K, Wagner W, Ho A, Konttinen YT, Zhang H, Hinescu ME, Steinhoff G. Mesenchymal stem cells and cardiac repair J. Cell. Mol. Med. Vol 12, No 5B, 2008 pp. 1795–1810. 2. Roodveldt C, Christodoulou J, Dobson CM. Immunological features of (alpha sign)-synuclein in Parkinson’s disease J. Cell. Mol. Med. Vol 12, No 5B, 2008 pp. 1820–1829. Corrigenda/Erratum J. Cell. Mol. ...
متن کاملTransformational Software Evolution by Assertions
This paper explores the use of software transformations as a formal foundation for software evolution. More precisely, we express software transformations in terms of assertions (preconditions, postconditions and invariants) on top of the formalism of graph rewriting. This allows us to tackle scalability issues in a straightforward way. Useful applications include: detecting syntactic merge con...
متن کاملDoppler Spectrum Estimation by Ramanujan Fourier Transforms
The Doppler spectrum estimation of a weather radar signal in a classic way can be made by two methods, temporal one based in the autocorrelation of the successful signals, whereas the other one uses the estimation of the power spectral density PSD by using Fourier transforms. We introduces a new tool of signal processing based on Ramanujan sums cq(n), adapted to the analysis of arithmetical seq...
متن کاملAn asymptotic expansion inspired by Ramanujan yRichard
Corollary 2, Entry 9, Chapter 4 of Ramanujan's rst notebook claims that 1 X k=1 (?1) k?1 nk x k k! n ln x + as x ! 1. This is known to be correct for the case n = 1, but incorrect for n 3. We show that the result is correct for n = 2. We also consider the order of the error term, and discuss a diierent, correct generalisation of the case n = 1.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the London Mathematical Society
سال: 1929
ISSN: 0024-6107,1469-7750
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/s1-4.13.32-s